Monday, August 27, 2012

The Aesthetics of Language


Sarah Kay: If I should have a daughter ...








 
 
 
Click on the link below to view a performance by spoken poetry artist Sarah Kay.


After viewing the video, choose one phrase/section that you really like and comment on how Sarah Kay manipulates language to make the content aesthetically pleasing.  In other words, what does she say that “moves” you and how does she say it?  Think in terms of every literary device you have every learned.

One thing you might want to focus on is how she uses allusions (A Reference to Something Historical, Cultural, Biblical, or Mythical).  An allusion is a literary device that also appears within essays and speeches.

Because you have so many reading and writing assignments this week, you do not need to comment on what your peers say unless you would like to send them a message.

Your response is due by Sunday, September 2nd at Midnight.

Monday, August 20, 2012

The Power of Facebook

Read the article below to get a little background on how Facebook is being used for political activism.  The article is from The Moor Next Door, a blog site on Maghreb Affairs, Geopolitics, and International Relations. 


A Self-Immolation in Mauritania

The story of the Tunisian Revolution has swept the Arab region, and so has the legend of Mohamed Bouazizi. Thus far, four Algerians and an Egyptian and a Mauritanian each have lit them selves on fire in protests meant to recall Bouazizi, the young man whose self-immolation inspired the Sidi Bouzid uprising. Bouazizi was twenty-six years old and unemployed. Yacoub Ould Dahoud, the Mauritanian who imitated Bouazizi’s act more recently was a forty-year old from a well off family. He lit himself up in front of the Presidential Palace. A Reuters report claims his grievance was “alleged government mistreatment of his tribe.” Ould Dahoud’s long Facebook message posted before the deed makes no reference or claim about his tribe being wronged (it begins “[. . ] no to the rule of tribalism … no to the return of patronage.”). He was not protesting his economic condition. He was making a blatant political statement: “a simple citizen demands legitimate rights.” Ould Dahoud wrote: “Enough corruption! Enough injustice in Mauritania! For fifty years we have suffered from corruption and injustice.” His statement, quoted and paraphrased extensively here, includes jabs at the army, the political elite demanding “the ouster from power of the clique of spoilers from the army” and “a cancelation of all duties and taxes on rice, wheat, [cooking] oil, sugar, dairy and monitoring of the outrageous profits from them” and demanded that anti-slavery activists be released from jail. His final statement even included a proposal for a constitutional amendments that would ban “current or former” military officers from running or being elected president, among other things. His message implored France: ”respect the right of the Mauritanian people to self-determination”. Ould Dahoud addressed his pleas to President Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz: “if you do not accept these demands, you will face the wrath of the People who will come out just like they came out against Ben Ali.” His cause was for ‘our children to live in a country with social justice, freedom and democracy.”
This is as activist as one can get. Unlike the copy-cat self-immolations in Algeria (and Bouazizi’s original) there was no apparent spark in his personal life and he was older and better off than several of the other men. Little is known about Ould Dahoud personally, though Mauritanians that crossed paths with him at various stages describe him as “a democrat,” by disposition. It appears he intended to mimic Bouazizi’s “spark” to revolution. His self-immolation will shock many in Mauritania but a Facebook page has already been set up called “Solidarity with Yakoub Ould Dahoud who burned himself for Mauritania,” with enthusiastic users changing their profile pictures to an image of the man burning on the street. It seems clear that the event has the regime nonplussed, which had a rough time getting outsiders to accept its legitimacy. That some news sites and agencies have buried the story somewhat is not an accident.

Now Click on the link below and read more about the concerns and responsibilities regarding the use of Social Media.


http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/01/the-inside-story-of-how-facebook-responded-to-tunisian-hacks/70044/

Comment on the articles (Other than the fact that four men literally lit themselves on fire as a form of protest).  Think about the implications of a society out of control.  Should  a Social Media network facilitate an uprising or should a government be able to shut down the Internet during times of unrest?  How might shutting down the Internet affect our freedom of speech if something similar were to happen within the United States?  Should government be for the people, by the people?  Or should the government do what they believe is for the benefit of the greater good?  These are just suggested questions to get you thinking.  Please feel free to take the discussion in any other intelligent direction.  But remember to:
  • Use evidence from the articles to support your response.
  • Respond to me by Friday, August 24th, Midnight and then  . . .
  • Respond to two of your classmates by Sunday, August 27th, Midnight.
  • Write in paragraph format adhering to grammar and punctuation.
  • You may want to compose your thoughts first within a Word Doc and then Cut/Paste it into the response section of the blog.  This way you can use grammar and spell check, plus you avoid losing your thoughts in case you have a problem while posting.

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Localism Overload
By Good. Food. Stories. Contributor | February 17, 2010 |

The Good. Food. Stories. team is extra-pleased to present today’s guest post from Jessie Knadler, a former Manhattan magazine writer and editor who now lives in rural Virginia with her husband, 30-odd chickens, two rambunctious dogs, and a host of farm equipment. Her adventures as a city girl attempting country living are chronicled on her “awesome blog” (her words and our feelings exactly) Rurally Screwed. We’re eagerly awaiting her canning-focused cookbook with co-author Kelly Geary that will be published by Rodale in Spring 2011.

When I first moved from Manhattan to rural Virginia four years ago, I assumed I was saying goodbye to the foodie fascism that had taken hold of the city. I took it as a given I’d never have to overhear two Brooklyn yoga moms prattle on about the virtues of free-range eggs for little Dexter and Elliot or listen to well-meaning friends pester waiters with questions like, “Is this beef really grass-fed?” I was fed up with thinking I too had to define myself by what I ate.

If only I was a little more organic, a little more free-range, steel-cut, Meyer lemon-eating, blah-blah-blah, I’d somehow be a better person. To me, the pursuit of dietary asceticism seemed like just another form of subtle social stratification, right up there with carrying the right handbag, only somehow less shallow, more “real.”

So I was excited at the prospect of moving somewhere where people, I assumed, still ate Slim Jims and where cocktail party food centered around Philadelphia cream cheese in various guises. I thought the most probing food question I’d encounter here was “Does the chicken fried steak come with brown or white gravy?”

Well, this is what happens when a pampered urbanite moves to the middle of nowhere—you quickly realize how provincial and ignorant you really are. Organic piety, I’ve since realized, extends to small-town America as well, to conservative communities where the rebel flag still proudly flies and where 30-somethings don’t think much about living in a cabin or a yurt.

In fact, dietary hysteria is actually worse here than in places like Park Slope or Berkeley because people in my small southern community tend to lead less frenzied lives—there’s less pressure to get your kid into the “right” school, the cost of living is pretty cheap, and people generally live closer to the land since much of the local economy revolves around agriculture and construction.

Rewarding career opportunities, especially for women, are somewhat limited, so a lot of moms end up making the procurement of food—organic, locally grown food—their primary occupation. And some take it to an almost fetishistic degree.


(This chick is now an egg-laying machine)

Here’s one recent example: A couple of months ago, I attended a lunch for which I brought each guest a carton of eggs. (My husband and I have a flock of 30 chickens.) When one of the guests who was refusing to let her five-year-old even eat a Hershey’s Kiss because they’re “poison”—saw my carton of eggs, she hesitated. “I don’t know,” she said. “Let me look at them.” She opened the carton, eyeballed the eggs and, in a distinctly withering tone, said, “On second thought, I don’t need any.”

I was offended. I had no idea why she refused my eggs. My flock is clean, they free-range over eight acres, they eat bugs and grass and grubs. I wondered, were my eggs not white enough? Did she refuse them because the carton was Styrofoam and not more eco-friendly cardboard? Or was it because she knew my husband and I supplement our chickens’ diet with—shudder—commercial feed from the farmer’s co-op?

The incident illustrated that food snobbery is not limited to the upwardly mobile in coastal cities, but also to people who live in cabins in the woods. It’s everywhere. There’s no getting away from it. It’s an entrenched part of the national conversation and I keep waiting for the day when it will all kind of go away, like the rollerblade craze of the early ’90s.

This is not to suggest that food awareness—knowing where your food comes from—isn’t important. Every time you turn around, there’s another study linking processed food to obesity, ADD, asthma… the list keeps growing. And the way animals in factory farms are raised is unconscionable at best. It is precisely because I am concerned with these matters that I now have two freezers stocked with three deer, shot for us by our rifle-toting neighbor, plus half a pig and half a cow (both locally raised and butchered, natch.)

(Even deep-friend Twinkies are not off limits from time to time.)

I have a huge garden and can my weight in fruits and vegetables like a deranged pioneering lunatic in the warmer months. My husband brews his own beer. We churn our own ice cream. We bought chickens so we wouldn’t have to eat the watery, jaundiced specimens that pass for eggs at the grocery store.

I’m about as homestead-y as you can get without owning a carpet beater, but I try not to look down my nose about it because the truth is, I still occasionally eat Funyuns. I sometimes eat fried mozzarella sticks dunked in Sysco marinara sauce. I snack on Milk Duds and processed crackers and hoover up the remaining flavor dust residue from my husband’s Roy Rogers French fries.
Even I spotted the food nazi who refused my eggs—the same one who won’t eat ice cream down at the local ice cream parlor because it’s “too full of fillers”—inhaling a plate of chili cheese fries down at the drive-in a few months prior! I’m no Michael Pollan, but I’m pretty sure the cheese on those fries didn’t come from a cow up the road, but a pump. In my mind, that made her refusal of my eggs more a rebuke of me than it was a stand for organically pure ovum. Which is to say, I probably won’t be inviting her to my next potluck.

So this is my gentle plea for 2010: Can we all please stop talking about localism and organic food now? Everyone’s a locavore anymore. (Or those that want to be anyway.) We get it. The eggs are free-range. The meat in the freezer is from a farmer down the road. The fish is sustainably caught. Understood. Here’s a gold star.

I welcome the day when we can all just sit down to the table and take it as a given that what we’re eating is good wholesome, nutritious food without feeling the urge to itemize the sourcing of each dish. You know, sort of like they do in Europe. Besides, odds are, somewhere along the line a Dorito will probably pass your lips.
Answer the following question with a brief paragraph:
1.) What is the point that Jessie Knadler is trying to make within her essay?
2.) Now, in another brief paragraph, identify a particular food or food issue that is exclusive to Kauai and explain why it is exclusive to Kauai.( This should take only 2 or 3 sentences) Once you indentify that food, then bullet a quick list of things you associate with that food or food issue.
Post your response to me by Friday, August 17th.
Respond to two other classmates about their food item by Sunday, August 19th.  Your reponse to your classmate needs to only be a few sentences.  But have something to say!  Just don't say, "I agree with you."  While you may agree with them, add onto their thoughts by adding new insight.

Monday, August 6, 2012

Modes of Discourse and Aristotel's Triangle

George Clooney working with Sudanese People



http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48030118/ns/world_news-the_new_york_times/

Click on the link above and Read the New York Times article and View the five minute video in which George Clooney addresses The United States Congress.

Read the entire directions and my discourse below before responding to the post:>).

Think about what you learned about writing this week in terms of Modes of Discourse and Aristotle's Rhetorical Triangle and choose One Option in which you respond to the article or the video by writing one supporting paragraph.  Due By Sunday, August 12th, Midnight.


Option 1.) Discuss what you think is the dominant mode of discourse within the text or within the video and highlight what you think is the author’s purpose. Remember to do the following:
  • Use a salutation of "Dear Ms. Carlson."
  • Close your posting with "Sincerely" or "Respectfully" and your name.
  • Write in complete sentences and utilize what you now should understand about topic sentences, supporting sentences, and unity.  Refer to your grammar homework given on Monday, August 6th.  The details are located within your syllabus.  If you lost your syllabus, refer to your Engrade account where you can find your syllabus on the first of each month within the Calendar section.
 Option 2.) Explain the the use of Aristotle’s Rhetorical triangle within the article or the video. Remember to do the following:
  • Use a salutation of "Dear Ms. Carlson."
  • Close your posting with "Sincerely" or "Respectfully" and your name.
  • Write in complete sentences and utilize what you now should understand about topic sentences, supporting sentences, and unity. Refer to your grammar homework given on Monday, August 6th. The details are located within your syllabus. If you lost your syllabus, refer to your Engrade account where you can find your syllabus on the first of each month within the Calendar section.


  • Try not to repeat the thoughts of others unless you agree or disagree with them.  If you use the thoughts of someone else, remember to cite their name within your response and add additional information to their existing thoughts.  In other words, do not  just echo what someone already said; you must add more comments that either support or refute their posting.  Please know that you do not have to discuss someone's posting.  You may simply respond to Option 1 or Option 2 as long as what you are saying is something different from what has already been posted in terms of supporting details.

                          To Refresh Your Memory

    Four Modes of Discourse
    1)     Exposition= writing that explains or informs
    2)     Narration=writing that tells a story
    3)     Description=writing that appeals to the five senses
    4)     Argument/Persuasion= writing that presents a position in hopes that a reader will accept an assertion
    Writing rarely uses only a single mode of discourse (connective speech or writing that is longer than a sentence).  However, even though more than one mode may be used, there is a dominant mode used by an author based on the author’s purpose for writing.

    You may Google Aristotle's Triangle if I have not taught this yet.

    Remember: Respond to only Option 1 or Option 2. 
    Due By Sunday, August 12th, Midnight.

    *****This time you do not need to respond to your peers.  Just respond to me.  You may comment on what they said, but please refer to my directions above.