Read the article below to get a little background on how Facebook is being used for political activism. The article is from The Moor Next Door, a blog site on Maghreb Affairs, Geopolitics, and International Relations.
A Self-Immolation in Mauritania
The story of the Tunisian Revolution has swept the Arab region, and so has the legend of Mohamed Bouazizi. Thus far, four Algerians and an Egyptian and a Mauritanian each have lit them selves on fire in protests meant to recall Bouazizi, the young man whose self-immolation inspired the Sidi Bouzid uprising. Bouazizi was twenty-six years old and unemployed. Yacoub Ould Dahoud, the Mauritanian who imitated Bouazizi’s act more recently was a forty-year old from a well off family. He lit himself up in front of the Presidential Palace. A Reuters report claims his grievance was “alleged government mistreatment of his tribe.” Ould Dahoud’s long Facebook message posted before the deed makes no reference or claim about his tribe being wronged (it begins “[. . ] no to the rule of tribalism … no to the return of patronage.”). He was not protesting his economic condition. He was making a blatant political statement: “a simple citizen demands legitimate rights.” Ould Dahoud wrote: “Enough corruption! Enough injustice in Mauritania! For fifty years we have suffered from corruption and injustice.” His statement, quoted and paraphrased extensively here, includes jabs at the army, the political elite demanding “the ouster from power of the clique of spoilers from the army” and “a cancelation of all duties and taxes on rice, wheat, [cooking] oil, sugar, dairy and monitoring of the outrageous profits from them” and demanded that anti-slavery activists be released from jail. His final statement even included a proposal for a constitutional amendments that would ban “current or former” military officers from running or being elected president, among other things. His message implored France: ”respect the right of the Mauritanian people to self-determination”. Ould Dahoud addressed his pleas to President Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz: “if you do not accept these demands, you will face the wrath of the People who will come out just like they came out against Ben Ali.” His cause was for ‘our children to live in a country with social justice, freedom and democracy.”
This is as activist as one can get. Unlike the copy-cat self-immolations in Algeria (and Bouazizi’s original) there was no apparent spark in his personal life and he was older and better off than several of the other men. Little is known about Ould Dahoud personally, though Mauritanians that crossed paths with him at various stages describe him as “a democrat,” by disposition. It appears he intended to mimic Bouazizi’s “spark” to revolution. His self-immolation will shock many in Mauritania but a Facebook page has already been set up called “Solidarity with Yakoub Ould Dahoud who burned himself for Mauritania,” with enthusiastic users changing their profile pictures to an image of the man burning on the street. It seems clear that the event has the regime nonplussed, which had a rough time getting outsiders to accept its legitimacy. That some news sites and agencies have buried the story somewhat is not an accident.
This is as activist as one can get. Unlike the copy-cat self-immolations in Algeria (and Bouazizi’s original) there was no apparent spark in his personal life and he was older and better off than several of the other men. Little is known about Ould Dahoud personally, though Mauritanians that crossed paths with him at various stages describe him as “a democrat,” by disposition. It appears he intended to mimic Bouazizi’s “spark” to revolution. His self-immolation will shock many in Mauritania but a Facebook page has already been set up called “Solidarity with Yakoub Ould Dahoud who burned himself for Mauritania,” with enthusiastic users changing their profile pictures to an image of the man burning on the street. It seems clear that the event has the regime nonplussed, which had a rough time getting outsiders to accept its legitimacy. That some news sites and agencies have buried the story somewhat is not an accident.
Now Click on the link below and read more about the concerns and responsibilities regarding the use of Social Media.
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2011/01/the-inside-story-of-how-facebook-responded-to-tunisian-hacks/70044/
Comment on the articles (Other than the fact that four men literally lit themselves on fire as a form of protest). Think about the implications of a society out of control. Should a Social Media network facilitate an uprising or should a government be able to shut down the Internet during times of unrest? How might shutting down the Internet affect our freedom of speech if something similar were to happen within the United States? Should government be for the people, by the people? Or should the government do what they believe is for the benefit of the greater good? These are just suggested questions to get you thinking. Please feel free to take the discussion in any other intelligent direction. But remember to:
- Use evidence from the articles to support your response.
- Respond to me by Friday, August 24th, Midnight and then . . .
- Respond to two of your classmates by Sunday, August 27th, Midnight.
- Write in paragraph format adhering to grammar and punctuation.
- You may want to compose your thoughts first within a Word Doc and then Cut/Paste it into the response section of the blog. This way you can use grammar and spell check, plus you avoid losing your thoughts in case you have a problem while posting.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteThe story of the Tunisian Revolution has caused tons of chaos. First, the Tunisian Revolution caused 4 men to burn themselves in protest, to protest about the way government treats them. Then, the Tunisian Revolution brings an uprising of Ammar in attempting of stealing and hacking into, “an entire country’s worth of passwords.” Ammar stealing passwords from the social network, Facebook, caused Facebook users to go through a lot of trouble by 1) Having their accounts stolen and deleted
And by 2) Going through a log-in process to save their accounts from being stolen or deleted.
The Tunisian caused a lot of trouble in November 1987, then causing more trouble in 2011 with the self-immolation and the Facebook uprising and hacking, also in 2011.
In my opinion, if an uprising was occurring on a Social Media network, the government should shut down the Internet during times of unrest. Yes, things would be crazy with people freaking about there being no Facebook, but stopping an uprising is much more important than Facebook chatting people and adding new friends. Although, if the government did shut down the Internet, chaos could happen with even more people creating riots and protests, discussing and arguing about how the government shouldn’t have the right to shut down the internet. But, if the Social Media network facilitates an uprising, a negative event that could occur would be people misreading what the Social Media network is doing. For example, if the Social Media network is involved, things could be photoshopped, just like the incident with Zuckerburg holding a sign that is photoshopped to represent in supporting an uprising of Sayab Sala7.
The Tunisian Revolution caused a lot uprising in protesters in Mauritania, and for the social network, Facebook.
Respecfully,
Jenny Anne Paleracio
Dear Jenny,
DeleteI have to disagree with you on this one mainly because the chaos caused by the shut down of the internet would cause mass destruction. Simply shutting down the internet wouldn't solve a thing? People nowadays are way too attached to electronics and the internet to just let the government shut it off. Es specially because they didn't like the way the people expressed their words.
Respectfully,
Triston Edmonds
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteInternet censorship seems to have been a controversial issue for a long time. We could argue that we the people aren't responsible enough to make wise choices about that we put on the Internet. Do we think about the ripple effect one little post could have? Rim, a Tunisian blogger, shares videos, and "small protests that reached 50 people could suddenly reach another 50, who could share it with another 50." The Internet is public, and we as Americans have a right to put whatever we want on it. But we must be careful: not everything on the Internet is true. For instance, the picture of Mark Zuckerberg holding a photoshopped sign was probably seen by millions and maybe inspired some activists anew--but it was fake. Sometimes users don't seem to understand just how public the Internet is, and use it irresponsibly.
On the other hand, only allowing certain things on the Internet (or shutting it down completely) is a contradiction to the people's freedom of expression. It's sad that in Tunisia, the Internet is being censored so often that "they'd come to expect it."
Censoring or shutting down altogether the Internet would be a violation of one of America's most basic and well-known rights: freedom of expression. Whether it is used for peace, or for uprising as it is being used in Tunisia, it should not be tampered with by any government. The choice of what to put on the Internet should be ours alone, and we should use that choice wisely. Users should simply have discretion and be aware that the Internet is very, very, public.
And it should stay that way.
Sincerely,
Jessica Meek
Dear Jessica,
DeleteYou changed my view a little. You're totally right. Shutting down the Internet would violate that well-known right: freedom of expression. We should be wise on what we put on the Internet because we have a privilege and we shouldn't ruin it.
Sincerely,
Jenny Paleracio
Dear Jessica
DeleteNot only do i agree with you that shutting down and ultimately censoring the internet oppresses our right to freedom of expression, but also the very true fact that the internet is a very public place, and should stay that way. And also that it shouldn't be the government's place to decide what goes on the web, but the people, but, the people should be wise and use discretion when uploading ANYTHING to the internet.
Respectfully,
Brandon Jenks
Dear Jessica,
DeleteI completely agree with your opinion of the article. The internet should stay public and open to all. And your thoughts on effective usage of the internet are also completely correct. When the internet is misused it can be disastrous indeed because everything can be viewed by anyone. On a side note, I found your response very well worded and thoughtful.
Sincerely,
Maluhia Kinimaka
Dear Jessica,
Deletewe share the same opinion on how shutting down the internet is a violation. I believe that as people of america we should have our rights and that includes the right to say what I want. I agree that it's sad that they would shutt it down because frankley I would miss the internet.
Sincerely,
Kristen Yam
Dear Jessica,
DeleteI completely agree with you about how government should have no say in the Internet. It is a civil right whether or not the government does not completely agree with it.
Sincerely
Amanda Althouse
Dear Jessica,
DeleteYou couldn't be more right, the internet is our little world where we as idividuals discuss issues in the real world without fear of authority judging or persecuting us, and shouldn't be restricted or halted by the government.
Sincerely,
Shiloh Begley
Dear Ms.Carlson,
ReplyDeleteIn our world today, people use the internet as a means of communication and receiving information. In the small country Tunisia, there were many protests and uprisings. One way Tunisians spread their protests were from the social network Facebook. Rim, a Tunisian Facebook user, stated "small protests that reached 50 people could suddenly reach another 50, who would share it with another 50." People do not realize that once you post something on the internet, it is like a chain reaction. Luckily for the Tunisians, the reaction they got from other Facebook users was positive. If it weren't for the rapid publicity of Facebook, many Tunisians accounts would be gone and information about Tunisian uprisings would still be unknown.
I believe that a government should not be able to shut down the internet in times of unrest. If there was any event of unrest in America, shutting off the internet would cause even bigger problems than before. It is also a violation of the people’s freedom of speech. Shutting down certain social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter would be more logical, but shutting down the internet altogether would create mass chaos.
Sincerely,
Burgandi Williams
Dear Burgandi
DeleteI thoroughly agree with you that the government should most certainly not shut down the internet, because it violates the rights of expression and freedom of speech. And that also yes, that if the government were to shut down social media sites like Twitter and Facebook, and the entirety of the internet, would in fact create mass chaos.
Sincerely,
Brandon Jenks
Dear Burgandi,
DeleteI have to agree i believe that your point is a very good one. Shutting down the internet would cause mass chaos all over the country. The internet is a world-wide way for people to connect, without it people would go insane. good job!
Respectfully,
Triston Edmonds
Dear Burganidi,
DeleteI too agree with your thoughts on keeping the internet running. Without it, our country would go insane very quickly! Take for instance, the recent attempt by the US government to impose the SOPA bill upon the internet. It was aimed to protect the copyrights of items online, but in doing that, it would block many pictures, websites, videos, ect. The American people freaked out, and it ended up causing so much chaos that large sites such as wikipedia and reddit went "dark" (stopped working for a few days) just to protest the passing of the bill. Many are actively working against it across the country. This just shows that the government should not try to filter or shut down the internet. It would only make things worse like you pointed out.
Sincerely,
Maluhia Kinimaka
Dear Burgandi,
DeleteI definitely agree with you on the facts that shutting the internet off would be chaos. Also the fact that you stated that "it would create even bigger problems than there already was" is a very good point.
Sincerely,
Nikki Ramos
Dear Burgandi,
DeleteI completely agree with your opinion of the article. I couldn't agree more when you said "If there was any event of unrest in America, shutting off the internet would cause even bigger problems than before." I also think that shutting down certain websites is reasonable, but not the entire internet.
Respectfully,
Angelika Questin
Dear Burgandi,
DeleteI agree wuth your response on the article. I think shutting down the internet would be a terrible idea and would just lead to more problems.
Sincerely,
Gavin Bryan
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDear Ms. Carlson
ReplyDeleteIt appears very clear that the Tunisian people are sick of their government under Dictator Ben Ali and being oppressed, and are using every tool to their usage to put an end to it. Though I don’t agree with the violence, or the protestors who lit themselves on fire, I think it’s a more peaceful alternative to use Facebook to spread ideology and the 411 on what’s going on in Tunis. Ould Dahoud, before of course lighting himself on fire in front of the presidential palace, wrote a long Facebook Message that was Clearly a blatant political statement, saying “Enough Corruption! Enough Injustice in Mauritania! For fifty years we have suffered under corruption and injustice”. Either way, soon a whole wave of Tunisians began using Facebook, not to just to speak their mind and protest oppression of their people, but to showcase it, for Facebook, unlike most websites, wouldn’t block the graphic footage of violent revolution going on in this country, and through videos and up-to-date messages and news uploaded to Facebook, that news broadcasters don't have to guts to show, created a link between the poor rural Tunisians in small villages and tribes to the broader Tunisian population the spread of unrest and want for change. Bloggers like Rim have been uploading videos that are uniting the people, 50 protesters show it to another 50, and so on, the people want change and want it now.But sadly, lead to the Tunisian regime or Ammar to begin a campaign to steal Tunisian accounts on FB to silence them, to leave people in the dark as to what's happening, and thus leading them to spiral back into their sea of despair and oppression, and their voices not heard for the sake of freedom.
From a personal perspective, i don’t believe that the government should censor, nor shut down the internet, due to unrest. Imagine unrest in a major nation like ours, the millions of people who would lose their internet would only get more infuriated, it’s the theft of our freedom of speech, which is simply what the Tunisian people want, besides other basic freedoms. These people for ages have been under dictators, from Habib Bourguiba to Ben Ali now, loss their freedom, LEADING to what is happening now! So to only make matters worse and take away the internet would only (in theory) create more chaos then there already is. They already revolted like this in '75 and '76, this violence will not end till the people's voices are heard!
Respectfully,
Brandon Jenks
Dear Brandon,
DeleteI liked your idea of Facebook unifying people. I didn't think of it like that before. It's amazing that even the most violent footage can create a bond in a nation that, say, word of mouth could not.
Sincerely,
Jessica Meek
Dear Brandon,
DeleteI likes your idea about how Facebook is a peaceful alternative I violence and that it's so unsensored that people are free to post anything and sometimes the news channels are unwilling to post these things. I totally agree with the fact that government shouldn't interfere with the Internet or control it in any way, and these are great reasons why they shouldn't.
Sincerely
Amanda Althouse
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteDear Brandon,
DeleteI very much agree with you in that people will not rest until their voices are heard. Free speech seems to not just be a right dictated by the government - but a part of basic human nature. People wish to be heard, and it appears that they will stop at nothing to do so.
Sincerely,
Griffin Madden
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteFor the citizens of Tunisia, I believe it was perfectly sensible for activists to "use all of the tools at their disposal" and take advantage of social media to express discontent with their corrupt governments. Using Facebook, they could reach multitudes of users starting with only a pool of around 50 original viewers. It actually seems proactive to me that the people of Tunisia would rally so strongly against their oppressive government to help themselves and create a better future for their children. Also, the way the Tunisian's are now utilizing Facebook (to make preemptive strikes against the entry of another corrupt leader) is very clever and may turn out to be useful for Tunisian citizens as they acquire new, and hopefully just, leadership.
I am a child of the technological revolution, therefore it is in my beliefs that the internet should never be shut down no matter the amount of political turmoil happening in the country. Reading that the Tunisian people had "come to expect" the removal of the internet at any time shocked me actually. Shutting down the internet, in my opinion, would be similar to taking away freedoms of speech and the press, and is most certainly not taken lightly. Not only would shutting down the internet in America be depriving us of basic rights, but it would also seriously cripple our means of communication with people across the country. Our society has become so reliant and intertwined with social media that businesses, political debates, daily online newspapers, stock trading, and our entire country in general would be disrupted. In fact, I don't even believe that our country could function one entire day without the use of the internet. My thoughts would be that chaos would be imminent, and riots aplenty.
Respectfully,
Maluhia Kinimaka
Dear Malu,
DeleteI completely agree with you. The Tunisian's use of Face Book was neither wrong nor an attempt to promote violence, as viewed by some. They were simply trying to alert people of their need for help and change. If I were placed under the dictatorship of the corrupt Ben Ali, I too would take advantage of every means of communication I had in reach.
Dear Maluhia,
DeleteI couldn't agree more with your comments about the Tunsinians usage of Facebook. I feel like to be successful in whatever you're trying to accomplish, you must utilize all of your resources.
I also agree with your comments about internet usage. In this era, were consumed by the internet and the ability which it gives us to access an unlimited amount of information in a matter of seconds. I feel that though the internet can be quiet useful, it can come to a point where it can misused,
Respectfully,
Brooke Spencer
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteIt is clear in the article that this is not the first Tunisian Revolution, but Facebook plays a key role in the current protesting. Not just Facebook, but the internet in general makes it easy and fast to spread information and statements in a way not available in previous times. The article The Inside Story of How Facebook Responded to Tunisian Hackers reads 'There has been a lot of debate about whether Twitter helped unleash the massive changes that led Ben Ali to leave office on January 14, but Facebook appears to have played a more important role in spreading dissent.' . Facebook soon became the many source of protesting, in forms of videos or even pages promoting a revolution. Also because its not face to face, people tend to be more brave on the internet, therefor more and more protests and opinions were said.
To me the internet has impacted the modern world in a good way, expanding learning options and making every day tasks easier. In this case its used in a way that is potentially dangerous, as the government sees it. Online protest is just a more modern way, and I think that no one group of people should have the power to shut it down.
Respectfully,
Whitney Beck
Dear Whitney,
DeleteI definitely agree with you that Facebook and the internet is playing a role in the protesting. The internet is for the whole world to see, and people all around the world are seeing the protests of the Tunisian People.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Paleka
Dear Whitney,
DeleteI agree that the internet is an ideal resource for spreading information. Facebook has played a major role in the amount of publicity this protest has received!
Sincerely,
Madisson Hinkel
Dear Ms.Carlson,
ReplyDeleteAs i read this passage about Tunisian revolt of their government, i saw a very good point and found my opinion. I found that a government should be by the people, for the people because in reality we are actually the people that run everything. just because you are in office or a big corporate C.E.O, doesn't mean you weren't a normal everyday citizen before? at one point before being elected or getting a promotion you were a regular person, just like the people that were revolting.
The message they were trying to send is simply that just because you are in a higher position doesn't mean you should be treated differently? i believe everyone should get the same respect no matter their place in this country. that is the message that these poor mistreated citizens are trying to get across to these thick headed governments officials. i think that it is wrong that a person in a higher position gets to live in a mansion with plenty of space for the poorer families yet they wont even look at these poor people being cast away because of their economic position. So my position is a government for the people by the people! The actual people that spend every day of their long lives working hard for there cheap house in a crowded neighborhood. While corporate C.E.O's go home to an empty house on a hill that can fit up to three families.
Respectfully,
Triston Edmonds
Dear Triston,
DeleteIagree that a government should be ran by the people, for the people because, the people make up the nation. we arent rich or exactly worth nothing but it's america and we the people should have a voice.
Sincerely,
Kristen Yam
Dear Triston,
DeleteI like the way you looked at the aspect in which no matter of what class or job you have we are all still people. I mean just because you are a big cooperate C.E.O shouldn't mean you get special privileges or anything. Your still just a citizen to the country.
This post is from AJ Cummings
DeleteDear Triston
When you waved that everyone that should be treated equal, those are the basic values of being friendly. As you said, " I believe everyone should get the same respect no matter their place in the country". I strongly agree with you. when we get older, we lose sight of what was it like being there.
Sincerely AJ Cummings
Dear Ms.Carlson,
ReplyDeleteInternet censorship has been an issue for a long time. People use the internet to get information and to communicate with others, but sometimes people aren't responsible to what they put on the internet. In Tunisia, there were many protests and uprisings. Facebook was a key role in the Tunisian protest. Rim, a Tunisian Facebook user, stated "small protests that reached 50 people could suddenly reach another 50, who would share it with another 50." The internet makes it fast and easy to spread information and statements and we don't become aware that once you put something on the internet, it's like a chain reaction.But we have to be careful, not everything on the Internet is true. Fortunately, the reaction the Tunisians got from other Facebook users was positive. Users don't seem to understand just how public the Internet is.
To me the internet has changed the world in a good way. It makes every day tasks easier, you can find out information quicker, and it's also another way you can chat with friends. But, I believe that a government should not be able to shut down the internet . If there was any times of unrest in America, shutting off the internet would create even bigger problems and would aggravate the millions of people who would lose their internet. In my opinion, shutting down the internet would take away our freedom of speech. I highly recommend people should start being more careful on what they post on the internet, but I think that no group of people should have the power to shut it down.
Respectfully,
Angelika Questin
Dear Angelika,
DeleteI too, believe that the internet is an improvement to our ability to receive and learn information. We are living in the "Information Age" so it is only right for us to be capable of sharing and viewing information quickly and with ease. I appreciate your view on the internet expanding our freedom of speech.
Respectfully,
Kekai Gonsalves
Dear Angelika,
DeleteI agree very strongly with your thoughts on the internet improving every day life. I also believe that shutting off the internet would also create nationwide panic, since us Americans are so reliant on the internet as a way to communicate and learn.
Respectfully,
Amber Diaz.
Dear Angelika,
DeleteI agree with your comments about how what you put on the internet can have a chain reaction. Many people don't think before they post, and because of this, rumors, lies, and unwanted publicity can be spread around the world, through a chain, in a matter of seconds. Yes, the internet does have it pros like you suggested earlier, but it does also have a negative toll on the world around us.
Respectfully,
Brooke Spencer
Dear Ms. Carlson
ReplyDeleteWhile reading this article, it became obvious to me that the Tunisian Revolution is most definitely out of control. I feel that the people of Tunisia had the right to use the internet to express their valid opinions about their government and politics. Since they used facebook, it allowed them to spread what they had to say, faster and more effectively. It seems potent that the people used this prime resource to express how strongly they felt about the government. The government ultimately affects the future, and the future is important.
Although the internet was one of the main factors as to why the Tunisian people were protesting, I feel that that’s no reason to completely censor the internet. Everyone knows that the internet is a public place, and what goes on the internet, stays there. I definitely feel that shutting down the internet would be almost similar to taking away freedom of press and speech. The internet has allowed us to prosper in so many things, that shutting it down would seem a bit foolish. Overall, I feel that the government has no place in censoring the internet in any way.
Sincerely,
Lexy Stogner
Dear Lexy,
DeleteI strongly agree with your comment that the government ultimately controls our future. They need to be careful about the choices they make as it affects everyone and our future. Thank you for pointing that out.
Respectfully,
Burgandi Williams
Dear Lexy,
DeleteI totally agree with you that using Facebook was a good way to express their feelings and tell others what they had to say and information that they needed to get out there. Also your point on completely censoring the internet is something I have to agree with as well, it is "foolish" and very unnecessary.
Sincerely,
Nikki Ramos
Dear Lexy,
DeleteI agree with you about the people of Tunisia having the right to express their opinions about their government and politics. Also that having that right shouldn't lead to the shut off of the internet.
Respectfully,
Gavin Bryan
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteThe Internet is a public place in which people can express what they want to say with no real restrictions or rules that they really have to follow. It also is a great place to share ideas or comments with fellow people and a great place to do that is with the social network called Facebook.
When reading the articles I believe that the Tunisian people had a right to post what they wanted on Facebook. Facebook was a helpful, fast, and efficient way of spreading information of expressing their opinions on the matter at hand. Facebook was a useful site to spread information about their discontent about the corruption of the government. It helped stream videos of the violence and messed up images of what was going on in Tunisian people.
Facebook would be a good alternative way to show their discontent for the government without lighting themselves on fire or violence, but because that guy protested against the current president Facebook pages have opened up about the revolt and the guy lighting himself on fire.
In my opinion the government should not have the option to shut down the internet or to intercept people logging to stop the spread of information. They have no right in doing that. The people of the world want to know the truth on what goes on on this world. In the Internet hacking, it was Internet service providers who were using a malicious code to prevent people from going on Facebook by stealing their passwords. It really is amazing like Sullivan said. "...an astonishing amount is susceptible to governments access.
Dear Kalani,
DeleteYou made a good point when you were talking about how much of the internet is susceptible to government access. No government should be able to dictate their people to such a degree that they infringe upon their basic human rights, and people have the right to disagree and vita against them.
Respectfully,
Griffin Madden
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteHaving followed the events that took place in the Arab Spring very closely, I was shocked as person after person set themselves on fire. Those fires were indeed the sparks to revolution in many of the dictator-ruled nations.It gave me tremendous respect for the people that were willing to sacrifice their bodies in the hope that they would be able to bring attention to something that the world has passively accepted until now. It makes me disappointed that in today's culture, something like genocide and oppression happens all over the world, yet Kim Kardashian's 72-day marriage was covered with enough detail to make my soul want to cry.
I think that FaceBook responded appropriately to the attempted government hack. I also believe that as a privately owned business organization, they have the right to do whatever they want. Freedom of Speech and the Free Market are two of the main ideas that make America, America. To try to restrict the right of any public organization to function as it pleases would be a nefarious violation of constitutional law.
In regarding whether or not the government has the right to "shut down" the internet, one must first consider whether or not they have even the ability to do so. The internet has evolved over the past decade into something that I doubt any one nation could really completely restrict it to its people. Many nations have had their systems hacked by groups of specialist rebels, such as Anonymous. But supposing the government did have the ability to do so, they would in no way have to right to. Shutting down the internet would be the 19th-century equivalent of burning the printing presses - something both completely unconstitutional and essentially unamerican.
I understand that not all countries function as democratically as we do, and I also understand that every country functions under different circumstances. Each country should be studied and assessed whether or not they can or should ever have to shut down the internet. As one of the most powerful nations in the world, I believe that we are in part responsible for helping oppressed people, while at the same time limiting the power of the corrupt.
Respectfully,
Casey
Dear Casey,
DeleteI completly agree with you about the point you made of the genocide and opression in today's soceity. It truly seems to be the only way to catch people's attention which is disappointing. America spends the majority of its time on pointless gossip that will soon become meaningless such as families like the Kardashians. Great reponse!
Sincerely,
Maria Fish
Dear Casey,
DeleteYour thoughtful response was very clear and well-done. I completely agree that we are partly responsible for helping oppressed people. It's sad that we as Americans take so much, like the Internet, for granted, while people in other parts of the world are suffering for what we call 'basic rights.'
Sincerely,
Jessica Meek
Dear, Casey
DeleteYou made some very good points here in how realistic it would really be to shut down internet. In my resposen i said the goverment should have the right to do that, and although they do now i wonder if they would even have to power to do such a thing, we are one of the most powerful countries in the world and if our country couldnt do it, would it be nearly impossible ?
Sincerely,
Sariah Beeby
Dear Casey,
DeleteI really enjoyed reading your essay which did a very good job of raising interesting points about our society today. I agree with you on how sacrificing your own body for protest is wrong. Society today needs to realize the important things that are happening in our world today. It's really annoying to hear about Kim Kardashian and Snooki's fat baby everywhere I go.
Sincerely,
Kailer Scopacasa
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteAfter reading the articles it is clear to me that the Tunisian society is out of control. A society is based on a strong central lead, usually the government. If the government is not allowing the people something, such as the internet, activist will take charge to make a change. If there is a dictator for a country, like Ben Ali (who most people don't like) usually means that the people are not being represented on what they want for their country as a whole, but by what one man wants. Facebook allowed people of Tunisia to start a type of protest against the government and they thought it was very useful. The way that protests were started before where at a rally, why have a rally when you can get your message out at a much bigger scale, that can be shared at an instant to many more people, then more, and so forth.
Giving the government the ability to shut off a countries internet is giving them way too much power. Being in the technology age, the internet is the one of the main means of communication. Taking away something like this to people who have had it available at any time it’s like shutting off the mail system in the nineteen hundreds. If our government were to shut off the internet in the United States, everyone would be upset and protest, because its become a necessity in most peoples everyday lives. The internet has also proved to be in collaboration with our free speech. Anyone can create a page or a post about anything in there own opinion. If this was taken away it’s, taking away our right to say what we want when we want to, to whoever we want to tell. It just goes to show how important the Social network and internet have become great influences on lives of mankind today.
Sincerely,
Alanna Bauman
Dear Alanna,
DeleteI totally agree that giving the government the ability to shut down the internet is way too much power. It's taking away a huge part of our rights to freedom of speech and being the technology age, shutting it down would cause mass chaos!
Sincerely,
Maria Fish
Dear Alanna,
DeleteI agree when you say that shutting down the internet would be a bad idea. It would be like taking away our freedom of speech. I also agree with you on the fact that social networking has become big influences of our lives today.
Sincerely,
Cassie WIlson
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteThis article was very absurd in my opinion. In the way that, to make an impression- is to rebel with fire. Most people may not realize how we take democracy for granted. Even though, it has some downsides. Like in countries like Tunisia, and other third-world countries don't hold the same rights and laws. Turbulent behavior like in the first article as described, IS due to society being untamable. Specifically government being amoral and "Injustice in Mauritania" as said by Ould Dahoud. What also suggests that the population is barren; is that it's been at a state of misconduct for about "fifty years". In the harsh conditions of a authority like that, action will take place against it- no doubt. During times of unrest, I think Social Media networks should enable the Internet. It's an outlet of communication for Ould Dahoud and others who want their word spoken.
Shutting down the Internet here would completely change everything. We rely on online information and much more to shut down the whole, world wide web. Yet if it really were to happen, our freedom of speech would once again have be used by word of mouth. Protests, even. Similar to Tunisia. I believe that government should be for the people and by the people. If laws are created for people, then they should reflect what the people want. If the government does everything, and don't take the people's opinion in consideration; most won't sit well with it. I retained a good deal of information from these two articles.
Sincerely,
Jimmelle Parong
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteDear Jimmelle,
DeleteI am very grateful for your comment that "we take democracy for granted." The blessing of being a part of a representative government is not always appreciated and reminding your readers of this is very vital to your view on the Tunisian Revolution and their people's use of the internet and Facebook. Just the simple truth that each of us, as citizens of America, have a say and have our rights is very gratifying and may even encourage people of other nations.
Respectfully,
Kekai Gonsalves
Dear Jimmelle,
DeleteI like that you said "If laws are created for people, then they should reflect what the people want." I very much agree with you. American citizens have a right to speak for themselves, and if the government were to shut down the internet, it would most definitely not reflect what the people want.
Respectfully,
Burgandi Williams
Dear Jimmelle,
DeleteI couldn't agree more when you said that "shutting down the internet would completely change everything". It's like taking away our freedom of speech. We rely on the internet for a lot of things, and shutting it down would create chaos!
Respectfully,
Angelika Questin
Dear Jimmelle,
DeleteYou're so right about everything completely changing if the internet was shut down, because its absolutely true! We are a generation surrounded by social media and electronics, we wouldnt know how to function without the internet!
Respectfully,
Amber Diaz
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteA lot of protesting took place in the country of Tunasia. Four Algerians an Egyptian and a Mauritanian lit themselves on fire in protest of not having any legitimate rights. Tunasians faced mass corruption, lack of freedom of speech, Internet censorship etc. One of the many ways they compass their protest is by posting videos and spreading dissent on social networks such as Facebook. Facebook is a key role in Tunasian protest, in the article it states that Tuansian revolution was a "Facebook revolution". Without Facebook, many of Tunasias conflict and uprising would still be a mystery or concealed.
In my biased opinion, shutting down the Internet in America would be like doomsday, the end of the world. The reason being is because we live in the era of technology and the Internet is a necessity of modern life. Without the Internet would be a violation to freedom of speech because that will disable us from giving out personal perspectives and or to express opinions on social networks etc. Shutting down the Internet should not be an option if we were in a similar situation as Tunasia because basically it will cause mass destruction nation wide and globally.
Respectfully,
Jeric Manzano
Dear Jeric,
DeleteI completely agree with you. This day and age, technological communication is crucial to people's lives. Just the thought of the chaos America would experience is a little harsh. Facebook is one of those major sites that contribute to stories like these. Our freedom of speech are our instruments.
Sincerely,
Jimmelle Parong
Dear Jeric,
DeleteI have to agree with you on the fact that shutting down the Internet would cause mass destruction nation wide and globally because of the fact that we rely way to much on the Internet for information or our daily needs. Everyone would be in a state of panic as most things and jobs do rely on the Internet.
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteI found these articles to be immensly immformative. This subject seems highly contreversial and something everyone should really look into to benefit their on knowledge on what exactly the internet is capable of.
The internet is a place we can freely speak and voice our opinions. Having said that, some of us-such as activists-choose to bring up a strong cause that can become extremley dangerous. The Tunisian Revolution is the perfect example of what can happen through Social Networking. I strongly believe freedom of speech is not something we want taken away so the fact that the government would take that away, even for a moment, is against the law.
Of course we need to be careful with the way we use our freedom of speech. Sites like Facebook and Twitter are open to everyone so people are bound to bring up some revolutionary problems. As Rim states "small protests that reached 50 people could suddenly reach another 50, who would share it with another 50. The idea that it might be time for the regime to change spread from city to city faster than street protests and even middle class places got involved." This quote purely caught my eye because the reason this protest happened so fast was because of the power of Social Networking like Facebook.
Sincerely,
Maria Fish
Dear Maria,
DeleteI see eye to eye with you. Facebook is a mighty implement to possible revolutions like The Tunisian one in example. Yes, social networking sites are capable of these actions; but also positive acts. So in both ways there are pros and cons. I like the way you emphasized that quote.
Sincerely,
Jimmelle Parong
Dear Ms.Carlson
ReplyDeleteFrom the events that happened during and following the Tunisian Revolution one can draw out quite a bit of information. Yacoub Ould Dahoud was a man who was tired and frustrated with his country so he took actions into his own hands. He took upon carrying out a legend and he set fire to himself just as the legend of Mohamed Bouazizi. One important thing to remember though one does not have to mutilate to facilitate a revolt. Ould Dahoud went on to say "Enough Corruption!... For fifty years we have suffered from corruption and injustice." He just like many of his fellow patrons were upset and wanted to change things. By all means Ould Dahoud's "spark" has created a even large fire.
How far is to far as far as internet censorship? when one is to hear that political-protest pages were being hacked someone needs to act fast, that someone was the social media. What started as hacks slowly became something lot worse, a catalyst. Twitter and Facebook combined became a center of knowledge a nation did not want to get out. Censorship may work for smaller things like parental controls but no one can hide a country catastrophe.
Sincerely,
Peter Sizelove
Dear Pedro,
DeleteI completely agree with you on self mutilation being the wrong way to get a message across. As I stated In my essay, "(I) believe that no human life is worth wasting like that. There are other ways." Peaceful protests are just as sufficient. If the internet were censored, all society as we know it would crumble. This world runs on the internet so it would be illogical to censor it.
Sincerely,
Kailer Scopacasa
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteThe story of the revolution happening in Tunisian’s is clearly a cry for help; they want freedom to make choices that will benefit their people. If they were to shut down the internet here it would violate our freedom of speech. We are a free nation and should be able to voice our opinions, like how I hope to be in this comment. A government should be for the people by the people, because if you benefit the people there will be less conflict within the people.
In the essay it says that “Four Algerians and an Egyptian and a Mauritanian each have lit themselves on fire in protests meant to recall Bouazizi, the young man whose self-immolation inspired the Sidi Bouzid uprising.” This is how the people have chosen to let their voices be heard. If you take cyber networks away where people can let their opinions be known they will find another way to voice how their government is treating them unfairly.
Yes it is true that “people aren't responsible enough to make wise choices about that we put on the Internet.” Like Jessica had said be for and that not thinking before we post it could be dangerous. Things can spread quickly on the internet, and will be known within weeks by just a small handful of people in the world who have computers. It can lead to something bigger and cause chaos.
Shutting down the internet could cause more chaos; people will become agitated and enraged. We should all think before we post things about “is this really what I want to post? Do I want people to actually see it, because thousands maybe millions will see what you posted.” If we just all think about what we do then the very public and worldwide internet shouldn’t bring harm to people.
Sincerely,
Kristen Yam
Dear Kristen,
DeleteI agree that shutting down the internet would violate our freedom of speech. We as Americans have the right to express any opinions as freely as we want. If the government felt uneasy by some opinions they could investigate them, not take it away from everyone.
Sincerely,
Taylor McGinnis
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteIn both articles, it is clear that the two societies are way out of control. Who would go as far as to sacrifice themselves in protest? That is absolutely crazy. Then, in Tunisia the government started stealing people's facebook passwords? I think that these are things that some people really need to think about. It could happen in the U.S. some day. Imagine how U.S. citizens would respond.
I think that it is just a bad idea for the government to shut down the internet, not just during times of unrest, but at all. The internet is another world for some people, their only escape. It's a place for free speech, where you can voice your own opinon without being judged or critized by people that you know. You can be someone completly different on the internet. If governments were to take that escape from people, especially during times of unrest, the chaos would be worse. All of the people that would use the internet to get their voices and feelings out, would instead go to the streets and make matters worse.
If something like this were to really happen in the U.S. people would go absolutely insane. We are so into our facebooks and twitter that it has become apart of our lifestyles. Take that away from people and there will be mass chaos. I feel that people all over the world should have the chance to say what they feel and have access to the internet at all times.
Sincerely,
Cassie Wilson
Dear Cassie,
DeleteI agree with your thoughts about how all these new social networks have become a lifestyle. By making new apps for smart phones its become really easy to stay connected on the go. There will always be problems within countries and Facebook and other sites have just become a tool to help people say what they need, and like you said at any time.
Sincerely,
Alanna Bauman
Dear Cassie,
DeleteThat's exactly how it would get, more chaotic. The people of Tunisia is already upset with the government, if they were to cut off the internet more people would go into rage. I agree that the internet is an area we can express our thoughts and feelings, but to think that they stole other passwords maybe they should possibly do something about that. Tunisia should consider the thoughts of there people, because cutting there internet supply is almost like changing their way of life.
respectfully,
Alexis Vicente
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeletePeople are using Facebook and other major social networks to spread awareness about the Tunisian Revolution. Corruption and injustice has plagued the country of Tunisia for nearly 50 years. The Tunisian people are becoming increasingly frustrated and fed up with their government and the oppressive dictatorship of Ben Ali. In an attempt to raise awareness of the corruption going on within Tunisia, a forty-year-old man, by the name of Yacoub Ould Dahound, decided to protest in a fairly drastic way; he lit himself on fire in front of the presidential palace. Before doing so, Ould Dahound wrote a long Facebook status on the subject. In this status he stated, “Enough Corruption! Enough injustice in Mauritania! For fifty years we have suffered under corruption and injustice…Our children [should be able] to live in a country with social justice, freedom, and democracy”. His words were received by many due to the large audience Facebook provides. Although, many people would agree, there are less drastic ways of protestation, what Ould Dahound did was tactful in the sense that it was insane and crazy so it appealed to many peoples curiosity. Obviously, when someone lights themself on fire, people are going to want to know why.
The internet has become a very influential place in this day-in-age. It is a major resource that people use to communicate with each other. If the internet was taken away in times of political unrest, I believe it would restrict people from sharing their opinions. This may seem appealing to a government official who’s being trash-talked all over the internet, however, I believe it would violate people’s freedom of speech. If the internet was taken away, I believe it would just create even more unrest because people wouldn’t be able to voice their thoughts to a broader audience.
Sincerely,
Madisson Hinkel
Dear Madisson Hinkel,
DeleteI agree that Yacoub Ould Dahound's form of protest was quite extreme. Lighting himself on fire did bring much publicity but I do not agree that it was the right thing for him to do to protest against the injustice in Mauritania.
Sincerely,
Taylor McGinnis
Dear madi,
DeleteAlthough i was rooting the other way for this article, i really liked yours points when you said that the people were tired of all the corruption which is why they retaliated. Thank you for your comments.
Respectfully,
Maile Tuttle
Dear Mrs. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteI feel that the people in these articles were completely out of control. They are crazy and obsessed with doing very horrid things in their country and posting all kinda of things on Facebook. They were so stuck in their stubborn ways and protesting that, according to the article, 4 men lit them selves on fire just to prove a point. I honestly think this is just so aubserd and ridiculous. Ould Dahoud was one of the worst ones. He had the nerve to “jab at the army” who are very important to countries.
I understand where these people are coming from because “ they don’t want discrimination, slavery, corruption, and they want fair right and self determination, but they need to go to the government and try and try to make them change. All of the violence and chaos is not worth it, because they are just giving the government more reasons to think “ well these people are just psycho and don’t know what they are talking about or want,” so of course their not gonna get their way then.
If I was the government I seriously would shut down both the electricity and Facebook. Like in the article on www.theatlantic.com, “Facebook is a very important part in this whole situation, and it allows strong ties in ways that Twitter cant.” The people were literally crazy. They would post Gorey videos, pass all kinda of information along, hack into others' and delete it, hack into computers and take passwords, and more. All just for a protest! I think the government should think of the greater good of the country and do what is right. For a country to be that crazy and inhumane about some protest, is not normal. Which is why I feel that the government needs to take more control and shut it all DOWN.
Sincerely,
Maile Tuttle
Dear Maile,
DeleteI agree with your interpertation of these events as ridiculous, and that their protests are unnecessarily violent. The government should take control of the situation before it gets worse. The internet should not play that big of a role in a persons life.
Sincerely,
Whitney Beck
Dear Maile,
DeleteI can not say that I necessarily agree with you when you say that the government should shut the internet down. But, I do see your point, and think that what some people are doing is absolutely ridiculous. I also agree with Whitney when she said that the internet should not play such a big role in someone's life.
Sincerely,
Cassie Wilson
Dear Ms.Carlson
ReplyDeleteThese people were obviously sick and tired of what was happening in their countries. Simple protesting wasn't working so extreme measures were taken. I, personally don't think self mutilation is right, but you gotta admit, it did prove a point. But I still strongly believe that no human life is worth wasting like that. There are other ways.
Sincerely,
Kailer Scopacasa
Dear, Kailer
DeleteI agree with you when you say no human life is worth wasting like that. However if the people felt they had no other way to protest maybe they should simply not be protesting. Extreme measures do not need to be taken. If someone wants to get their point across do it in a safe non violent way.
Sincerely,
Sariah Beeby
Dear Kailer,
DeleteI am completely with you on your view on self-mutilation. as I said in my comment of the article "One does not have to mutilate to facilitate a revolt". As many have said already it proved a point. Not a single person should have to be subjected to hardship and be dealt with little or no action what so ever.
Sincerely,
Peter Sizelove
Dear Kailer,
DeleteI agree with you that self mutilation isn't right and that it's not right for humans to waste their life like that. Like Sariah said in her response, people can get their point across in non-violent ways.
Respectfully,
Jonathan Paleka
THis repy is from AJ Cummings
DeleteDear kailer,
i strongly agree that the people that protested that they did the right thing. And as you mentioned they have could've took this protest differntly. Some ways such as, a street protest, a silent protest, or even a petition. But I don't think they knew about the history of USA and what kind of protests that we did, to have a government reform.
Sincerely
AJ Cummings
Dear, Ms.Carlson
ReplyDeleteI believe that social media should not be part of a social uprising and be used as the main source of protest. That fact that it is means people need to get off their computers and promote what the think or believe should happen in a non violent productive way. Such as, not setting yourself on fire. If people are using facebook in such a vulgar way, documenting the actual violence going on something needs to happen to stop this. That is not the purpose of facebook, its supposed to be a safe enviroment for people to interact and keep in touch with their friends and family. Although shutting down the internet would be taking away americans "freedom of speech" if thats what the goverment needs to do to keep human beings safe so be it.
Sincerely,
Sariah Beeby
Dear Sariah,
DeleteYour points made about social media and its safety really spoke to me. Facebook was created as a networking site to maintain connections with people in a non-vulgar and no-violent way and as such people should keep it that way. You're also right that social media shouldn't play a part in an uprising, however censorship may be good in a minor form but as shutting down large parts of the internet goes I would have to disagree.
Sincerely,
Peter Sizelove
Dear Sariah,
DeleteThough I agree that Face Book is meant to be a safe and friendly environment for people to interact with freinds through, I do not by any means agree that the activists use of it was wrong. The Tunisian people were crying out for help and needed the help of Face Boook to alert others of this. And although you think that the shutting down of the internet would be the governments way of keeping human beings safe, in the case of the Tunisian people, it would rather be the governements way of prolonging the the rule of their corrupt ruller Ben Ali. I do not believe when taking this action, that the governement's priority was to keep people safe.
Respectfully,
Shania Weiss
Dear Sariah,
DeleteI really liked when you said that facebook is a place to interact with family and friends and supposed to be a safe environment. I think this is so true. These people are using facebook for all the wrong reasons, and because of their actions they are risking getting it shut down and maybe even the internet! Thank you for your comments.
Respectfully,
Maile Tuttle
Dear Ms.Carlson,
ReplyDeleteIt has amazed me that several people have actually gone to the lengths of physically setting themselves on fire. As far as politics go, I keep my political views to myself. To speak of such things and openly discuss them, would be in my mind, utterly rude. The fact that someone has actually considered harming themselves in hopes of others seeing the same way, has somewhat upset me and bewildered me. It seems that the political turmoil MUST be in chaos.
As far as the internet goes, I don't feel that the government has any right to restrict internet use in any way. Take the Chinese for example, there are many stories of those who grew up in China, and knew nothing about what has been happening in the world. They come to America with new eyes and no fear of the government breaking down their door for searching something on their desktop. I do not want to live this way. I spend a lot of time on line and America is based on many freedoms. Naturally these Constitutional rights were created before the internet was even an idea, all the same I feel as though using the internet as a vessel for communication should be respected as a freedom of speech, even in foreign countries.
Sincerely,
Amanda Althouse
Dear Amanda,
DeleteI too think that sharing your political views is something to keep to yourself. People are always going to be in disagreement over something, and Politics is a big one. Everyone has a right to their own opinion and it's a better idea to keep your views to yourself to avoid conflict.
Sincerely,
Alanna Bauman
Dear Amanda,
DeleteI agree with you that these people went to far into extremes just to prove their opinion. And to have a whole country doing that is defiantly not a good sign.
Sincerely,
Whitney Beck
Dear Amanda,
DeleteI agree with you that lighting yourself on fire is very extreme, but I also feel that these people are very oppressed and perhaps its the only way that their voices will be heard.
Respectfully,
Aveilana Saldaña
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteThe Tunisian Revolution seemed to have generated a sea of turbulent unrest and disorder. The reaction of the people of Tunisia has caused much distress and suggests that they are completely out of control. The self-immolation of a handful of men as well as the many forms of protest they carried out has been and remains to be the source of great disturbance. Facebook has been put to significant use by these people because it gives them the opportunity to share their thoughts in their current circumstances.
Declared by the Atlantic, "Facebook became an indispensable resource for tracking the minute-by-minute development of the situation." The social media network, Facebook, was the only site the people could rely on to pass on information in their country. Although, most of the posts were troubling and very unsettling it was the only way for knowledge to be distributed. The internet has developed into the number one manner in which to contribute and partake in news and details of events. It has improved the way to receive news because it is not only faster but provides a true inside story. Due to these reasons the internet should be open for people to utilize. Even if people share things they shouldn't or take "freedom of expression" and speech to an extreme they should still have that freedom. A government cannot control a person's thoughts- furthermore, in these times thoughts mean internet posts. Facebook does in fact ask "what's on your mind?"
Respectfully,
Kekai Gonsalves
Dear Kekai,
DeleteIt is so true that Facebook has become a mode of venting as well as a very convenient way to share information. Without it, many people would not be aware of things occurring in the outside world. Also, these people's political views must weigh on their minds quite heavily if they are going to such lengths as to light themselves on fire to show their repulsion.
Respectfully,
Aveilana Saldaña
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteThe people in this country were so obsessed with protesting and would do crazy, terrible things and post them on Facebook to get information around to others and let them know what was going on and it helped too, like Abida said, " 'it basically went from being a waste of time or procrastination tool, to my go-to source on up-to-date information.' " I do not think that the Social Media network should facilitate an uprising and the government should not shut down the internet during times of unrest. This is because Social Media is a good way to communicate with other especially during times of unrest and also if they shut down the internet, I think that those times of unrest would get worse than they already were because people didn't have the luxury of finding out what they needed to in an instant. Shutting down the internet would affect our freedom of speech is something similar would happen in the US by not letting us make sure that our friends and family are safe through the internet or we could be closed out from the rest of the world and no one would know what was going on, so no one would be able to help.
Sincerely,
Nikki Ramos
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteI believe that the government should not be able to shut down social cites during a time of unrest. True, social cites like Facebook contributed in the amount of uprisings in Tunisia because it was easily accessible information. Although it was easy to spread information to others to cause riots and uprisings. It was also a way for those who wanted to make sure that their loved ones were safe, such as Rim Abida with her mother.
If the Internet was shut down during a time of unrest in the United States not only would it be making millions of citizens angry it would be affecting our right of free speech. In our country we have the right to express our thoughts on whatever we want to. If the government was feeling uneasy I believe they could investigate their worries, but not to fully shut down something like Facebook.
The government should be for the people. The citizens elect the people they feel should govern them, and in return the government should listen to the citizens.
Respectfully,
Taylor McGinnis
Dear Taylor,
DeleteI agree with the point you made involving the internet being shut down, causing people to get angry. I for one, would most definitely feel as if my rights were being taken away. If the government were wanting to take action, like you said, they could look into the issue more, but not completely shut it down.
Sincerely,
Lexy Stogner
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteAs citizens of the United States it is easy for us to take our freedoms for granted. These articles express the conditions relating to freedoms in countries like Tunisia, and they are bleak. I do not believe that a government should be able to have complete control over social networks in their countries because it cripples the masses. The harsh reality of what is going on in these oppressed countries might not even be fully revealed to more "advanced and developed" countries because the information that is allowed through is heavily heavily filtered if not altered entirely. Citizens should be able to organize amongst themselves for the greater good, especially against a tyrannical government. The articles explain that men have lit themselves on fire, (obviously they are trying to make a point) to express their distaste. Something that extreme is a very big statement and I don't believe that government has a right to stop people from being moved by another person's actions.
Respectfully,
Aveilana Saldaña
Dear Aveilana,
DeleteI really liked the point you made about how our freedoms are so easily taken for granted. I feel that the statements you made completely relates to the issues in the article. I also agree with you that the government should not have complete control over social networks and such. The government should not control peoples actions.
Sincerely,
Lexy Stogner
Dear Ave,
DeleteI completely agree with you that we, here in the US, take our rights for granted. Your response is also well-written and concise. I think it encompasses the view that the majority of democratic Americans have towards our and others rights to internet usage.
Sincerely,
Casey
Dear Ave,
DeleteI also agree with you, as you can see alot of foreign countries judge alittle harshly on us based on how we take alot of things for granted, especially freedom, something that nations and many wars and lost lives have been traded for it.
Sincerly,
Shiloh
Dear Ave,
DeleteI agree with you, that the government shouldn't be able to restrain its people from expressing themselves and announcing their opinions. However, I do not agree that the government should be allowed to control the internet. I feel as though it's out of their hands.
Sincerely,
Madisson Hinkel
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteIn places like Tunisia true freedom is something that can really only be dreamed about. Here in the United States we have many rights and freedoms, we often take for granted little things like a mostly unrestricted internet and social networks. In America, pretty much anything can be written on Facebook, Twitter, and other social networks. The uprising that has begun in Tunisia may seem petty to most people, seeing as how the source of the riots come from the lack of internet freedom, but for the people of Tunisia these riots could mean much more. However, I do not see self harm as a way to effectively make a statement but apparently the Tunisian people were so desperate to be heard, they resorted to such terrible measures. I do believe things have spun out of control, and that people need to calm down, but i also believe that the Tunisian people deserve to have their voices heard.
Shutting down the internet in America would probably create a massive uprising. Many business rely on the internet, and so do a good amount of the American people. We use the internet as means to educate ourselves as well as to communicate with others, take that away and what will we have? More ignorance? I think so. Although, if the Tunisian governement believes shutting down the internet will benefit its people then so be it. I do however, hope that will never happen in America, but if it was for the very best interest of the nations people then i guess everyone would just have to learn to adjust. Come on, there was life before the internet!
Respectfully,
Amber Diaz.
Dear Amber,
DeleteI agree about your statement verifying that in many ways things have become out of control and we take many things for granted. But i think we don't realize we do it as much because of the fact that we didn't go through many trials an tragic events as others.
Respectfully, Kelieann Nuesca
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteBefore I speak about the obvious injustice of the shutting down of the internet I would like to talk about what first came to mind when I read about the Tunisian’s predicament. The Tunisian’s are protesting, they are trying to rebel, they are willing to face death, if needs be, to get their message across. They have a corrupt ruler, Ben Ali, and are calling out for change. A government of democracy should not be trying to hide or ease unrest, such as this, through the micromanagement of social media. The government should rather be taking notice that their people are unhappy with the current situation and respect their desire for change. The fact that the Tunisian people “have come to expect” the censorship or discontinued use of the internet enforced by the government, simply further displays the corruptness of the Tunisian government.
I believe that any government would be out of place to take any action towards the shutting down of the internet. Despite the fact that such an action would be violating freedom of speech, expression, and press, it, as many before me have mentioned, would bring upon great chaos. Our world today is so heavily dependent on the internet, that shutting it down doesn’t quite strike me as an even possible suggestion.
I also believe that Face Book, itself, should be neither praised nor blamed for the use of it by the activists. Face Book is simply a means of communication.
P.S. I personally feel as though the use of Face Book by the Tunisian activists, was both clever and expected.
Respectfully,
Shania Weiss
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteI fully agree with the reason why these people are protesting. They want to be treated fairly and receive legitimate rights; but I don’t see why they need to light themselves on fire. If the government of their country doesn’t really like them in the first place, do you think the government is going to care if they light themselves on fire? That’s one less person that’s bothering them. The reasons they are protesting are undeniable but the ways they protest need to change.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Paleka
Dear Jonathan,
DeleteI fully agree with you on your point on how lighting themselves on fire is not going to help there cause. Yes, it will get the peoples attention but will the goverment really do something about it or are they just going to say there crazy and not care? I guess we'll find out sooner or later.
Sincerely,
Ashlie Overmyer
Dear Jonathan,
DeleteI agree strongly that the terms of protesting were a bit on the "crazy" side. You made a good point on how they didn't care about them before and they probably won't care after. However, they will begin to care when other countries see what are happening and may want to take actions against them because of inhumane cruelty. I feel you could have elaborated a little on your letter.
Thoughtfully,
Kulia Blalock
Dear Jon,
DeleteI agree with you on the fact that people light themselves on fire for ignorant reasons but maybe that's the way they only think they can get their protesting to a more higher limit. i feel that they don't fully understand because of the fact that they are not the ones winning this battle of they continue to try an kill themselves.
Sincerely, Kelieann Nuesca
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteI agree with the reason why these people are protesting. They wanted to be treated fairly and receive real rights, but I don’t see the need for them to light themselves on fire. If the government doesn’t really like them in the first place, the government isn't going to care if they light themselves on fire. That just means that there is less people for them to deal with. The reasons they are protesting are good and they have a right to protest, but they need to think about different ways to protest.
Sincerely,
Gavin Bryan
Dear Gavin,
DeleteThe purpose of protesting the government is not to get the attention of the government. In most places, the government know who and to what extent people disagree with them. In the Arab Spring, the people who lit themselves on fire did so to get the attention of their fellow citizens and of the international community.
Sincerely,
Casey
Dear Gavin,
DeleteI agree with you on why they are protesting. But the government will care if people are lighting themselves on fire and it is seen by millions of people all around the world.
Sincerely,
Lars Vali Pd.2
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteI can see how a serious debate wether or not disabling the internet was right for the greater good during a time or a public uproar and rebellion, but in my opinion I feel no matter what the circumstance the internet should always be avalible, it not only gives the people the ablility to communicate and share ideas like how Bouazizi, a young man who set himself on fire protesting the corruption and the wrongness that his tribe and people were being treated with, but also a link for the government to communicate with their people on a more sedated enviorment where people can take a moment and comprehend what they are saying without influences of blind rage for the injustice they've suffered.
Sincerely,
Shiloh Begley
Dear Shiloh Begley,
DeleteI agree with you; your response is different from the others. I never thought of opening up keeping the internet available as away to link the government so they can communicate with their people. I always like your last few words "comprehend what they are saying without influences of blind rage for the injustice they've suffered." Nice choice of words!
Respectfully,
Jenny Anne Paleracio
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteDear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteThe ramifications of these Tunisian protests are heart-breaking and unfortunate. However, I sympathize with the people who took such drastic measures to draw attention to their corrupt government from the outside world. While their measures may not have been the best way to deal with this situation, they have undoubtedly led to the outreach of Tunisian corruption to the rest of the world.
Freedom on the Internet is very important in the 21st century, and there is no doubt that there would be massive uproar against government interference with the internet. However, it is not just about socializing - it is also about information. The Internet is a major artery through which our world news is transmitted and heard. Even television stations rely on the Internet to receive and relay their news. Technology should remain open and free to every single human being on earth - we rely on the Internet so much that it may as well be a basic human right.
Respectfully,
Griffin Madden
Dear Griffin Madden,
DeleteHeartbreaking is very true. The ramifications of these protest were definitely not the best way to deal with the situation given to them. During the 21st century, it really would be like cutting off supply to some peoples lives. We depend too much on technology to save us.
Respectfully,
Kulia Blalock
Dear Griffin Madden,
DeleteI can't agree with you anymore.Our lives do rely on the internet, we use it to keep in touch with friends and family without it we would be lost. It wouldn't be fair to these people to be kept away from the internet, they have lives of their own.These people have no other way to express their feelings about Tunisan's corrupt government, this was their own way to take action.
Respectfully,
Alexis Vicente
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteI think what is happening right now in Tunisia it totally out of control and something needs to be done. I totally and full heartidly agree with why there protesting but I think there taking this way out of poportionate, to have 4 men light themselves on fire is absolutly absurd. For example, facebook was made to meet new people, interact with friends, and a place for everyone to hang out, not for videos of awful things like the violence going on and all this turmoil to be placed on there. I personally and honestly believe that if the goverment feels that they need to shut off the internet to fix all of this then they should do it. Yes, it may not sit well with some but its beter then having all the volger stuff on sites where its not ment to be put on like facebook. I personally think its best for everyone.
Respectfully,
Ashlie Overmyer
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteI believe the events occurring in Tunisia have gone to extremes. I feel that the social media is one of the greatest ways to get across what is happening around us, wasn't that what they were made for? Social media makes it easier to spread ideas and to communicate. This is a very strong motive to why the government may choose to shut off the internet. The government doesn't want to be over thrown so to solve this problem they will go to any means to prevent an uprising. It is very tragic to see that to gain even a slight bit of freedom people in other countries are potentially risking their lives. A lot of times we don't see what a privilege it is to be able to say what we wish about the government, religion, and social life.
Respectfully,
Kulia Blalock
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteThe actions taking place in Tunisia is getting really out of hand. I understand the fact that the government would take action by shutting off the internet due to the fact of how people are spreading the idea of protest. But it's a big thing to shut off the internet, the internet is a big way on how to the world spreads news, and communicate. In my opinion i think the government should handle this in another way. If these four guys faced death just cause they wanna overthrow their ruler, maybe they should think about changing their ruler. Everyone should have a say in what they want, and if there'a a fair amount of people who agrees with there corrupt ruler they should immediately remove them.
Respectfully,
Alexis Vicente
This post is from AJ Cummings
ReplyDeleteDear Ms. Carlson
The government that was running this country wasn't doing a really good job. The 4 men that burned themselves wanted change within their system. Changes such as, freedom, democracy and social justice. Freedom has a big impact on the american way of life. The freedom of speech has granted us our ablities to say what we think. The internet has given us that ability. On the internet helps us express whats on our mind. If the government is going to shut down the internet, then they are going to have a colossal amount of contorl. In that situation, the government will become corrupt, and injustice will have a seat in the law. That's why we departed from England. The government needs to be runned for the people and by the people.
Sincerely
AJ Cummings
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteI feel that this article has made me open my eyes to more of an understanding and giving myself a reality check. I feel like i take myself an the freedom of being a U.S citizen for granted to the rights of religion, freedom of speech, my education, where i want to live , an the friends i want to hang out with. There are practically no limits to what we America can do. But we take that for granted each and every day. But i also feel for the other people in countries such as Tunisia that fell like that only way to get there word across is to hurt themselves. Not to mention that the government is not even trying to back them up instead they are trying to take control of more and more things then they already have. Those are the things we take for granted. The other government need more trust god worthy wisdom people to run a great country instead of trying to tear it down.
Sincerely, Kelieann Nuesca
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteI think that the results of what was going on in Tunisia went way too far. Today internet is a huge deal and for the government to take that away was definitely too far and I don't think was under their rights. So I do agree with the people protesting against them. Though lighting yourself on fire over a computer is even more unnecessary than the government taking away the internet. The government already didn't care and wasn't doing anything, so how was losing four lives by setting yourself on fire supposed to make the situation better. I think that both sides of the situation just went way out of hand. I think there should have been more civilized communication and less craziness.
Sincerely,
Shianne Schorr
Dear Shianne
DeleteI agree with your opinion on keeping the internet uncensored and open. But I will have to disagree with your statement on why they set themselves on fire. The first man burned himself to protest against corruption and injustice. The other three men lit themselves on fire to recall the first man. The internet was only a tool that was used to spread the incident.
Sincerely Lars Vali Pd.2
Dear Ms.Carlson,
ReplyDeleteIn the world today internet plays a huge part in many of our lives weither it be communicating, doing work or researching for anything. I feel that with out social media we would be a wreck just thinking of it, and to even think that the government may be shutting it off is ridiculous. I understand why the people are protesting and im all for it because they want to be treated fairly and have rights, but to light yourselves on fire just for that cause is way too crazy to me. I think they should find better ways of protesting like finding more convincing ways rather then practically killing themselves.
Sincerely,
Kanani Colburn
Period 3
Dear Ms Carlson
ReplyDeleteThe extremes people will go to acquire their freedoms is incredible. The four men that lit themselves on fire shows how much freedom means to them. Here in America we have the freedom to say and publish almost anything we want, yet there are many who want to take these rights away. By censoring or shutting down internet, it takes away these rights. Yet as seen in the Middle East the freedom of internet can create violence and revolts. Thousands and even millions of people could hear about an event minutes after it happens. One man burns himself and three more follow, without the internet it might have never happened. But I believe that the internet should not be censored or shut down by democratic governments. Internet is a great tool, yet as seen, it can be a very dangerous tool.
Sincerely,
Lars Vali Pd. 2
Dear Ms. Carlson,
ReplyDeleteI was greatly intrigued with the extent activists went to to prove a point. I feel that social media sites are a great way to inform others of on going issues, but should NOT be used to facilitate an uprising. I feel social media networks are a place where you can interact and reconnect with others in a friendly manner; not a place to start conflict and uproars which lead to the overthrow of a nations leader. I feel that if people do want to stay connected with each other over the internet to plot such schemes, they should be done privately, not on a public site where their identities may be compromised. Overall, I feel that yes, social networking sites are a very useful tool when trying to make a point, but it should not be taken to the point where it is misused.
Sincerely,
Brooke Spencer, Period 1